Byttes? Nikon 300mm VRII AF-S 2.8

Nikon 300mm AF-S VR II 2.8 Nano

Ny pris er 85.000-90.000 pr dags dato.

Selges for kun 18500, eller byttes i noe spennende.

Meget pent brukt. Fungerer som den skal, men lager noe lyd ved fokusering. Ellers er den lynrask og spot on!

This said, this is sharper than any Nikon lens other than the other fast fixed ultrateles. Look at the Sample Images; it's ultra-sharp out to the corners — wide-open!

It's ultrasharp and contrasty right out to the full-frame edges at f/2.8. The other Nikon 300 2.8s have also been stunners like this since the late1970s; I'd be surprised if this lens was anything short of stellar.

As all of Nikon's 300mm f/2.8 EDs have been, performance is exceptional, even shot wide-open. Anything that's not sharp is your fault, not the lens.'

Nikon's MTF curves confirm this; its essentially optically perfect:

Autofocus is ultra fast. It's so fast you just might not believe how much faster this state-of-the-art professional lens is compared to Nikon's consumer lenses like the 200-500mm and 80-400mm.

This 300/2.8 can rack all the way in and out in the blink of an eye.

Even if this lens weren't so fast and so sharp, you'd want it just because it focuses fast enough to catch whatever you're shooting.

Passer blant annet d5 d6 d810 d850 d500 eller speil løst med ftz adapter. Selv brukt den på Z9 Z6III, men passer også andre modeller som z7 z7ii z5 z50 zf zfc z8 z6ii z6

As a guy who's owned probably every Nikon lens ever made, even for Nikon's 1940s-1960s rangefinder cameras, I'm astonished at how this one lens replaces every other lens I used to use, with the exception of ultra-ultra wides.

The 28-300mm VR is my freedom lens. It lets me get rid of my old fashioned "camera bag" full of lenses that I used to carry.

While people who haven't shot it don't trust that it's sharp, it's newer and sharper than all the fixed lenses I used to haul around, and I can get any focal length with a twist of my wrist. Look at my Nikon 28-300mm sample images and see for yourself:

The 28-300mm VR replaces all the lenses we used to haul around. The only thing it doesn't do is replace an ultra-wide lens like the 16-35mm VR, or allow us to shoot sports in dim light like the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR FL. If you need anything longer, you'll get better photos by getting closer with the 28-300mm VR than you will by using a longer lens like the 600mm VR from farther away.

As you can see, VR works great, letting me get ultrasharp results hand-held at 1/20 of a second. Not only does this lens let me leave my bag home, I can leave my tripod home, too.

Vivid Yellow Tree by the Merced River, Yosemite Valley

Vivid Yellow Tree by the Merced River, Yosemite Valley, October 2017. Nikon D850, Nikon 28-300mm VR at 36mm at f/8 hand held at 1/20 at Auto ISO 400, Perfectly Clear v3.5. bigger or full-resolution.

Full review.

The only other lens I sometimes carry with my 28-300mm is my 16-35mm VR:

16-35mm f/4 VR (2010-today) top

Nikn 14-24mm

16-35mm VR.

For Nikon FX DSLRs,

The 16-35mm is sharp, sharp, sharp, even wide open, and even in the corners.

I've shot a lot of fixed 24mm, 20mm, 18mm, 17mm, 15mm and 14mm lenses in my days, and this zoom is sharper.

The Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 AF-S is the precursor to the 16-35mm VR. I find the 16-35mm a little sharper and much smaller and much more practical, but consider the 14-24mm if you need f/2.8 or 14mm.

If you want a really fast lens in an even smaller package than either of these, Nikon's 20mm f/1.8G AF-S is a unique ultra-speed ultrawide. None of Sony, Canon, or Fuji make a lens this wide and fast; it's also ideal for photographing the Milky Way. I bring my 20mm f/1.8 when I'm travelling light instead of the 16-35mm VR.

Make sure that you know How to Use Ultrawide Lenses.

Full review.

70-200mm f/2.8 VR FL (2016-today) top

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 FL

70-200mm f/2.8 VR FL.

For Nikon FX DSLRs. 77mm filters, 50.3 oz./1,425g with tripod collar, 3.6'/1.1m close-focus. Check price.

While I prefer my 28-300mm because I prefer to carry less, most full time pros would never leave the house without their 70-200mm f/2.8 VR FL, which is the world's best 70-200mm lens.

For lighter weight at a much lower price, also consider the 70-200mm f/4.

For more reach, consider the 80-400mm VR, and again, I prefer my 28-300mm over all the rest of these because I don't need f/2.8 and I prefer my 28-300mm's all-encompassing zoom range.

Nikon 200-500 200-500mm VR

For Nikon FX DSLRs. 95mm filters, 81¼ oz./2,300g with collar, 73¾ oz./2,090g without collar, 7.2'/2.2 m close focus. Check price.

The 200-500mm is unique in being super-long, super-sharp, and very inexpensive. It's a steal!

It doesn't focus closely (7/2'/2.2m) and it doesn't zoom wider than 200mm, which are how Nikon is able to make this so inexpensively and have it work so well as an ultra tale.

The 80-400mm VR is more versatile as a general-purpose tale. The 80-400 focuses much closer and zooms much wider, but it also costs much more. If you get this 200-500mm, you'll still want a regular tele like the 70-200mm f/2.8 FL or even my favorite 28-300mm VR. 24-70mm f/2.8